Is Jesus God?

Paano ginawa ang doktrina ng Santisima Trinidad?

Noong 1st century

ang paniniwala ng mga Kristiyano kay Kristo, SIYA AY TAO at ang AMA ang TUNAY NA DIYOS ayon na rin sa BIBLIYA.

Ayon sa Apostles' Creed na pinaniniwalaan ng Roman Catholic Church na gawa ng mga apostol ayon sa kanilang tradisyon, ang Diyos ay ang Ama na makapangyarihan sa lahat. Si Kristo ay anak ng Diyos na ating Panginoon.


Ito ang nilalaman ng creed:

I believe in God, the Father almighty, creator of heaven and earth.
I believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord.
He was conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit and born of the Virgin Mary.
He suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried.
He descended to the dead.
On the third day he rose again.
He ascended into heaven, and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
He will come again to judge the living and the dead.
I believe in the Holy Spirit, the holy catholic Church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and the life everlasting. Amen.

Noong First Council of Nicaea (325 AD) 

ginawang Diyos si Kristo, isang creator hindi creation at  nagkaroon ng inkarnasyon kaya naging tao. Dito nila inimbento ang term na "Trinity".


Ito ang nilalaman ng Creed:

"We believe in one God the Father Almighty, Maker of all things visible and invisible; and in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only begotten of the Father, that is, of the substance [ek tes ousias] of the Father, God of God, light of light, true God of true God, begotten not made, of the same substance with the Father [homoousion to patri], through whom all things were made both in heaven and on earth; who for us men and our salvation descended, was incarnate, and was made man, suffered and rose again the third day, ascended into heaven and cometh to judge the living and the dead.

And in the Holy Ghost. 

Those who say: There was a time when He was not, and He was not before He was begotten; and that He was made out of nothing (ex ouk onton); or who maintain that He is of another hypostasis or another substance [than the Father], or that the Son of God is created, or mutable, or subject to change, [them] the Catholic Church anathematizes."

Noong Second Ecumenical Council/ First Council of Constantinople (381 AD)

naging ganap ang pagka Diyos ng Holy Spirit at nanggagaling daw ito sa Diyos Ama.


Ito ang nilalaman ng creed:

"We believe in one God, the Father, the Almighty, maker of heaven and earth, of all that is, seen and unseen. 

We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the only Son of God, eternally begotten of the Father, God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten, not made, of one Being with the Father. 

Through him all things were made.

For us and for our salvation he came down from heaven. 

By the power of the Holy Spirit he became incarnate from the Virgin Mary, and was made man.

For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate, he suffered death and was buried. 

On the third day he rose again in accordance with the Scriptures.

He ascended in heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father. 

He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead, and his kingdom will have no end.

We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life, who proceeds from the Father. 

With the Father and the Son he is worshiped and glorified. He has spoken through the Prophets. 

We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church. 

We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.

We look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. Amen."

Noong Council of Chalcedon (451 AD)

naging dalawa ang likas na kalagayan ni Kristo: Diyos at tao.


Ito ang nilalaman ng creed ayon sa Chalcedonian Definition:

"We, then, following the holy Fathers, all with one consent, teach people to confess one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, the same perfect in Godhead and also perfect in manhood;  

truly God and truly man, of a reasonable [rational] soul and body; consubstantial [co-essential] with the Father according to the Godhead, and consubstantial with us according to the Manhood; in all things like unto us, without sin; 

begotten before all ages of the Father according to the Godhead, and in these latter days, for us and for our salvation, born of the Virgin Mary, the Mother of God, according to the Manhood;

one and the same Christ, Son, Lord, only begotten, to be acknowledged in two natures, inconfusedly, unchangeably, indivisibly, inseparably;

 the distinction of natures being by no means taken away by the union, but rather the property of each nature being preserved, and concurring in one Person and one Subsistence, not parted or divided into two persons, but one and the same Son, and only begotten God (μονογενῆ Θεὸν), the Word, the Lord Jesus Christ;

as the prophets from the beginning [have declared] concerning Him, and the Lord Jesus Christ Himself has taught us, and the Creed of the holy Fathers has handed down to us."

Noong Third Council of Toledo (589 AD)

Idinagdag ang filioque sa creed, kung saan ang Holy Spirit daw ay nanggagaling mula sa Ama at SA ANAK

 “who proceeds from the Father and the Son” (filioque)

Hindi pa ito naging ganap na aral, hanggang sa ito ay maconfirm lamang sa Fourth Lateran Council (1215), Second Council of Lyons (1274) at Council of Florence (1438-1455). Ito ang naging isa sa mga dahilan kung bakit humiwalay (The Great Schism 1054) ang Eastern Churches sa Western Church (Roman Catholic Church) na dati ay isang Church lang ito. Ayon sa paniniwala ng Eastern Churches, sa AMA lang nangagaling ang Holy Spirit habang ang Roman Catholic ay naniniwala na sa Ama at sa Anak ito nanggagaling.

First Council of Nicaea hanggang Council of Chalcedon

Mula sa paggawang Diyos kay Kristo hanggang sa pagkakaroon niya ng dalawang likas na kalagayan, inabot sila ng 126 YEARS para lang imbentuhin ang kanilang paniniwala sa kaniya at sa Trinity.  Hindi biro ang mga taon na iyon dahil 1 century yon ng debate sa napakaraming konsilyo para ganap na maimbento ang doktrina ng TRINITY. Isama pa ang dagdag na aral kung saan ang Holy Spirit daw ay nanggagaling sa Ama at sa Anak, bagay na hindi nila pinagkasunduan kaya humantong sa GREAT SCHISM 1045.

Ang Catholic Church (east and west) ay parang isang gobyerno, ang mga bishops nila ay ang mga kongresista at senador na gumagawa ng mga batas. Pinagdedebatihan nila yon bago ito maging isang ganap na paniniwala para sa lahat, hanggang makabuo sila ng kredo. Sa mga konsilyo nilang ito o pagpupulong nila ginagawa ito, para solusyunan ang mga problema sa church nila na may kinalaman sa kanilang pananampalataya. Mula sa doktrina hanggang sa mga practice.

Ang problema kasi, dahil dito, hindi na PURE GOSPEL ang kanilang nagagawa kundi may dagdag bawas na dahil nakadipende ito sa kung ano o sino ang mananaig sa kanilang magiging mga debate. Kung halimbawa ang pinagtatalunan ay ang sagot sa 1+1, kung ang sagot ng majority ay 11, wala namang magagawa yung iba kahit pa MALI ang sagot nila. Sa bawat konsilyo kasi hindi naman 100% ang pagdalo ng lahat ng bishops ng church nila kundi kung sino lang yung dadalo, kahit pa marami ang inimbitahan.

Ibig sabihin, kung ano ang pinaniniwalaan ng mas nakararami, kahit hindi pa nagkakaroon ng debate eh yun ang mananaig. Nagbobotohan kasi sila. At ang lahat ng bishops na hindi susunod sa paniniwalang napagkasunduan, ay paparusahan.


ISIPIN: Paano kaya ang mga Christians na nabuhay bago ang 325-451 AD? Ibig sabihin mali ang naging paniniwala nila kay Kristo? 

Isa pala siyang Diyos, creator, at may dalawang likas na kalagayan... Ang Holy Spirit pala ay Diyos din...

Ang totoo, hindi natapos sa Council of Chalcedon ang kanilang mga debate tungkol sa paniniwala nila kay Kristo at sa Trinity. Kaya wag na tayong magtataka kung bakit ang Iglesia ni Cristo ay hindi nagsubscribe sa mga kredong inimbento nila. Kung ikukumpara natin ang imbento nilang paniniwala kay Kristo at sa Diyos ngayon sa BIBLIYA, NAPAKALAYO at masasabi natin talagang NALIHIS na sila sa TUNAY NA ARAL NA MAKIKITA SA BANAL NA KASULATAN. 

Ang inilahad kong mga impormasyon dito ay hindi ko inimbento, wala akong personal na interpretasyon na ginawa, kahit kayo mismo magsearch sa history books makikita niyo yan. 

Yan po ay ang KATOTOHANAN.

Pinakamatinding palusot sa pagka Diyos ni Kristo

Hindi ko alam kung seryoso ba ang mga naniniwalang Diyos si Kristo o nang aaning lang kapag ipinagtatanggol nila ang pagka-Diyos niya. Kapag kasi binigyan mo sila ng pagkarami raming ebidensya na tao si Kristo at hindi Diyos, ang isasagot naman nila "Meron ba kayong mababasa sa bibliya na sinabi ni Kristo, hindi ako Diyos?".

Hindi ako nanlalait o kung ano pa man pero yon na yata ang isa sa mga walang ka sense sense na palusot na nabasa ko. Taktika ng mga pilosopo. Ang mga pilosopo kasi walang common sense, yun bang kailangan mo pang kumpletuhin ang mga sinasabi mo para lang magets nila.

Kapag ba sinabi mong lalaki ka, kailangan mo pang sabihing hindi ka babae?

Kapag ba sinabi mong gutom ka, kailangan mo pang sabihing gusto mong kumain?

Kapag ba sinabi mong maputi ka, kailangan mo pang sabihing hindi ka maitim?

Kapag ba sinabi mong gusto mong maglakad, kailangan mo pang sabihing ayaw mong tumakbo?

Kapag ba sinabi mong tatay ka ng anak mo, kailangan mo pang sabihing mag-ama kayo?


Kailangan pa bang sabihin ni Kristo na siyay hindi Diyos kung sinabi na niyang siya ay TAO? 

At kailangan pa ba niyang sabihin siyay hindi Diyos kung mismong siya na ang nagpakilala sa IISANG TUNAY NA DIYOS, ang kaniyang AMA, na sinabi niyang kaniyang Diyos at Diyos din natin? 

Ano sa tingin nyo?

Posible nga bang ang Diyos ay binubuo ng tatlong persona?

Napakadami nilang naimbentong palusot ngayon, este paliwanag sa kanilang 1 Diyos na may tatlong persona, andyan yung kinumpara nila ang kanilang Diyos sa tao daw na binubuo ng katawan, espirito at kaluluwa, andyan din yung kinumpara nila ang kanilang Diyos sa 3 in 1 na kape na binubuo ng creamer, asukal at kape.

Naisip ko, may point naman sila. Pero nag isip ako ng mas malalim, dahil hindi naman ako yung taong bigla na lang naniniwala sa mga nababasa at naririnig ko, inanalize ko...

Ayon na rin sa bibliya, ang tao ay binubuo ng katawan, espirito at kaluluwa:

"May the God of peace himself make you holy in every way. And may your whole being—spirit, soul, and body—remain blameless when our Lord Jesus, the Messiah, appears." 1 Thess 5:23

Kapag ang isa sa mga bumubuo sa tao ay wala o nawala, hindi maaaring mabuhay ang tao, halimbawa may katawan at espirito nga siya wala namang kaluluwa, wala rin yun:

"So, considering that Soul means breath - no, you could not exist on Earth, or anywhere else for that matter, for very long." "Without these forces of life, no, no-one could exist on earth. So you can't exist without a spirit again."
source: answerbag.com

Eh paano kung mawawala ang isa sa mga persona ng kanilang Diyos, magiging DIYOS pa ba ang kanilang DIYOS?

Nung ipinako si Kristo, ano ang nangyari sa kaniya? Di bat namatay? 2/3 days siyang namatay ngunit nabuhay naman siyang mag uli. Tanong, paano kaya nag exist ang kanilang Diyos nung mga panahong namatay o nawala ang isa sa mga persona na bumubuo dito?

Eh kung hiwa hiwalay ang bumubuo sa kanilang Diyos, magiging Diyos pa rin kaya ang kanilang Diyos? 

"As soon as Jesus was baptized, he came up out of the water. Then heaven opened, and he saw God’s Spirit coming down on him like a dove. And a voice from heaven said, “This is my Son, whom I love, and I am very pleased with him.” Matthew 3:16-17

Kung ating iintindihin ang mga verses, may tatlong binabanggit dito: si Kristo, ang Ama, at ang espirito ng Diyos o ang espirito santo. Ang Ama ay nasa LANGIT, ang espirito santo naman BUMABABA GALING SA LANGIT at si Kristo naman nasa LUPA, especificaly nasa ilog ng Jordan dahil kakabautismo lang sa kaniya ni Juan Bautista (baka may pilosopo kasi dyan^^) Tanong, paano kaya nag exist ang kanilang Diyos gayong hiwa hiwalay ang kaniyang persona? 

Paano kaya mag eexist ang tao kung nakahiwalay ang katawan sa espirito at kaluluwa? Paano kaya mabubuo ang masarap na kape kung magkakahiwalay ang creamer, kape at asukal?

Nagets nyo ba ang punto ko?

Ngayon, ang tanong, eto bang Diyos na may tatlong persona ang sinamba ng mga Hudyo sa OLD TESTAMENT? Eto bang Diyos na may tatlong persona ang ang Diyos ni Kristo? Eto bang Diyos na may tatlong persona ang Diyos na ipinangaral ng mga Apostol?

Kung ang sagot ay hindi, saan naman kaya napulot o nakopya ng mga nag imbento ng Trinity doctrine ang aral na ito?

Ano sa tingin niyo?

Ito kaya ay galing sa concept ng Trimurti ng mga Hindu?



The Trimurti (English: ‘three forms’; Sanskrit: त्रिमूर्तिः trimūrti) is a concept in Hinduism "in which the cosmic functions of creation, maintenance, and destruction are personified by the forms of Brahmā the creator, Vishnu the maintainer or preserver and Śhiva the destroyer or transformer," These three deities have been called "the Hindu triad" or the "Great Trinity", often addressed as "Brahma-Vishnu-Maheshwara." 

source: wikipedia

 
Kung hindi sa Trimurti, saan kaya sa mga ito?

Three-headed deities

Further information: Polycephaly

• In Hindu mythology, Trisiras and Dattatreya are explicitly tricephalous deities, but other instances of three-headedness are also found in Hindu iconography, for example in depictions of goddess Durga.
• The smaller Gallehus horn has a three-headed figure, holding an axe in its right hand and a rope tethered to the leg of a horned animal in the left.
• The hound Cerberus in Greek mythology is often depicted with three heads.
• Geryon has been depicted as three-headed on the Herculean Sarcophagus of Genzano currently held at the British Museum.^[34]

List of triple deities

Historical polytheism

• The Classical Greek Olympic triad of Zeus (king of the gods), Athena (goddess of war and intellect) and Apollo (god of the sun, culture and music)^[36][37]
• The Delian chief triad of Leto (mother), Artemis (daughter) and Apollo (son)^[38][39] and second Delian triad of Athena, Zeus and Hera^[40]
• The Olympian demiurgic triad in platonic philosophy, made up of Zeus (considered the Zeus [king of the gods] of the Heavens), Poseidon (Zeus of the seas) and Pluto (mythology)/Hades (Zeus of the underworld), all considered in the end to be a monad and the same Zeus, and the Titanic demiurgic triad of Helios (sun when in the sky), Apollo (sun seen in our world) and Dionysus (god of mysteries, "sun" of the underworld) (as can be seen on Plato's Phaed on the myth Dionysus and the Titans)^[41]
• In ancient Egypt there were many triads:
  • Osiris (husband), Isis (wife), and Horus (son),^[42]
  • the Theban triad of Amun, Mut and Khonsu
  • the Memphite triad of Ptah, Sekhmet and Nefertem
  • the Elephantine triad of Khnum (god of the source of the Nile river), Satet (the personification of the floods of the Nile river), and Anuket (the Goddess of the nile river).
  • the sungod Ra, whose form in the morning was Kheper, at noon Re-Horakhty and in the evening Atum, and many others.^[43]
• The Hellenistic Egypt triad of Isis, Alexandrian Serapis and Harpocrates (a Hellenized version of the already referred Isis-Osiris-Horus triad), though in the early Ptolemaic period Serapis, Isis and Apollo (who was though sometimes identified with Horus) were preferred^[44]
• The Roman Capitoline Triad of Jupiter (father), Juno (wife), and Minerva (daughter)
• The Roman pleibian triad of Ceres, Liber Pater and Libera (or its Greek counterpart with Demeter, Dionysos and Kore)
• The Julian triads of the early Roman Principate:
  • Venus Genetrix, Divus Iulius, and Clementia Caesaris
  • Divus Iulius, Divi filius and Genius Augusti
  • Eastern variants of the Julian triad, e.g. in Asia Minor: Dea Roma, Divus Iulius and Genius Augusti (or Divi filius)
• The Matres (Deae Matres/Dea Matrona) in Roman mythology
• The Fates, Moirai or Furies in Greek and Roman mythology: Clotho or Nona the Spinner, Lachesis or Decima the Weaver, and Atropos or Morta the Cutter of the Threads of Life. One's Lifeline was Spun by Clotho, Woven into the tapestry of Life by Lachesis, and the thread Cut by Atropos.
• The Hooded Spirits or Genii Cucullati in Gallo-Roman times
• The main supranational triad of the ancient Lusitanian mythology and religion and Portuguese neo-pagans made up of the couple Arentia and Arentius and Quangeius and Trebaruna, followed by a minor Gallaecian-Lusitanian triad of Bandua (under many natures), Nabia and Reve female nature: Reva^[45]
• The sisters Uksáhkká, Juksáhkká and Sáhráhkká in Sámi mythology.
• The triad of Al-Lat, Al-Uzza, and Manat in the time of Mohammed (Holy Qu'ran (Abdullah Yusuf Ali translation), Surah 53:19-22)
• Lugus (Esus, Toutatis and Taranis) in Celtic mythology
• Odin, Vili and Ve in Norse mythology
• The Norns in Norse mythology
• The Triglav in Slavic mythology
• Perkūnas (god of heaven), Patrimpas (god of earth) and Pikuolis (god of death) in Prussian mythology
• The Zorya or Auroras in Slavic mythology
• The Charites or Graces in Greek mythology
• The One, the Thought (or Intellect) and the Soul in Neoplatonism

Eastern religions

• Lord Dattatreya
• The Saha Realm Trinity in Mahayana Buddhism (Shakyamuni, Avalokitesvara and Ksitigarbha)
• Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva (Trimurti) in Puranic Hinduism
• Mitra, Indra, and Varuna in early vedic Hinduism
• Shakti, Lakshmi, and Saraswati (Tridevi) in Puranic Hinduism
• The Three Pure Ones in Taoism
• The Fu Lu Shou in Taoism
• Ayyavazhi Trinity

New religious movements

• The Triple Goddess in Wicca
• Nuit, Hadit and Ra Hoor Khuit in the Thelemic spiritual system 

source: wikipedia

Napakadami pa lang pagpipilian, at kung mapapansin natin, lahat ng relihiyon pala na may pinaniniwalaang Diyos na 3 in 1 o 3 Diyos ay mga PAGANO, bago pa pala mag exist ang Kristiyanismo ay marami nang mga 3 in 1 o 3 na mga Diyos ang mga tao (na pagano), diba meron ding ganyan sa Kristyanismo? Diyos Ama, Diyos Anak at Diyos Espirito Santo.

Baka naman sabihin ng ilan, WALA SA MGA YAN, IMPOSSIBLE YAN, MALABO YAN!

Talaga?

O sige, pagbigyan na natin, sabihin na nating wala diyan sa napakaraming choices ng origin ng trinity na yan, ano kaya ang pinaka possibleng PINAGMULAN ng imbentong aral na ito?

Sagot: Hellenization. 

Ano ang Hellenization?

"Hellenization (or Hellenisation) is the historical spread of ancient Greek culture or Hellenistic civilization, and, to a lesser extent, language, over foreign peoples conquered by Greece or in its sphere of influence, particularly during the Hellenistic period following the campaigns of Alexander the Great of Macedon. The result of Hellenization was that elements of Greek origin combined in various forms and degrees with local elements." 

source: wikipedia

Ilan ba ang Diyos ng mga Griyego?

Naku, alam na natin ang sagot dyan! Napakadami! Sila bay PAGANO RIN? OO naman!

Ano naman ang kinalaman ng Hellenization sa pag imbento ng Trinity doctrine?

"Hellenistic thinkers, who influenced Christian theologians, had already been attracted by the emphasis in later Judaism on monotheism and transcendence. this tendency was sketched out earlier in Plato and later Stoicism, but it came to its mature development in Neoplatonism in the 3rd centuryA.D. In the first century Philo of Alexandria had interpreted the old testament concept of God in terms of the logos idea of Hellenistic philosophy, but this Hellenization led to a characteristic tension that was to dominate the entire further history of ideas." Encyclopedia

"During the 19th century, protestant historians, notably F.C Baur and Adolf von Harnack, sought to show that the Trinity was a result of "Hellenization of the gospel" while Friedrich Schleiermacher declared that a species of modalism was the only meaningful version of the doctrine. " Encyclopedia

"Initially, both the requirements of the monotheism inherited from the Old Testament and the implications of the need to interpret biblical teaching to Greco-Roman paganism seemed to demand that the divine Christ as the Word or Logos be seen as subordinate to the Supreme Deity. An alternate solution was to interpret the Father, Son and Holy Spirit as three modes of the self-disclosure one God, but not as distinct within the being of God itself." Encyclopedia

“It was when Christianity spread out into pagan world that the idea of Jesus as a savior God emerged.” The meaning of the dead Sea scrolls

Ibalik natin ang tanong kanina, ano ba ang Diyos na sinasamba ng mga Hudyo dati at magpa hanggang ngayon?

The conception of God in Judaism is strictly monotheistic. God is an absolute one indivisible incomparable being who is the ultimate cause of all existence. Jewish tradition teaches that the true aspect of God is incomprehensible and unknowable, and that it is only God's revealed aspect that brought the universe into existence, and interacts with mankind and the world. In Judaism, the one God of Israel is the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, who is the guide of the world, delivered Israel from slavery in Egypt, and gave them the 613 Mitzvot at Mount Sinai as described in the Torah. He also gave the Seven Laws of Noah to all human-kind.

source: wikipedia

Kung ang kinikilalang Diyos ng mga Hudyo ay hindi lang basta isa kundi IISA LANG at ito nga ay ang AMA, bakit hindi sila sinaway ng Diyos at bakit hindi man lang itinuro ng Diyos kay Abraham, Isaac at Jacob na siya ay hindi IISA LANG kundi may tatlong persona? 

Bakit sinasabi lagi sa kanila ng Diyos na walang ibang Diyos maliban sa kaniya at wala siyang nakikilalang ibang Diyos?

 “I am the LORD, and there is no other; Besides Me there is no God I will gird you, though you have not known Me; That men may know from the rising to the setting of the sun That there is no one besides Me. I am the LORD, and there is no other,” Isa. 45:5-6 

“Remember the former things long past, For I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is no one like Me,” Isa. 46:9  

“You are My witnesses," declares the LORD," And My servant whom I have chosen, So that you may know and believe Me And understand that I am He Before Me there was no God formed, And there will be none after Me.” Isa. 43:10  

“Declare and set forth your case; Indeed, let them consult together Who has announced this from of old? Who has long since declared it? Is it not I, the LORD? And there is no other God besides Me, A righteous God and a Savior; There is none except Me.” Isa. 45:21

 
Eh di ba sabi nila, nag eexist na si Kristo kasama ng Diyos pati ng Holy Spirit simula pa noong lalangin ang mundo? Eh bakit hindi man lang sinabi ng Diyos na meron din Diyos Anak at Diyos Espirito Santo para naman naging TAMA man kung saka sakali ang paniniwala nila Abraham at ang mga hudyo tungkol sa TUNAY NA DIYOS? Bakit naman kineklaim ng Diyos Ama na SIYA LANG ANG DIYOS AT WALA NG IBA? 

Sabi pa niya, " Before Me there was no God formed, And there will be none after Me." eh paano na si Kristo at ang Espirito Santo, akala ko ba silay mga Diyos din?

At bakit ba kasi hindi tinuro ni Kristo ang tungkol sa Trinity? Bakit niya sinabi na siyay ANAK NG DIYOS at hindi DIYOS na isa sa mga persona ng Trinity? Bakit niya sinabi na IISA LAMANG ANG DIYOS, at itoy walang iba kundi ang AMA na nasa langit? Bakit si Kristo na Diyos daw ay may Diyos din? 

Sana, itong mga tanong na ito ay makatulong sa pagbukas ng inyong isipan at makatulong sa pagsusuri sa tunay na mga aral na nasa bibliya. Hangad ko na mahanap nyo ang katotohanan lalot napakahalaga na ALAM NATIN at KILALA NATIN ang sinasamba nating Diyos at kung sino ang TUNAY na DIYOS, baka hindi natin alam na ang Diyos palang sinasamba, at kinikilala natin ay MALING DIYOS, nakikitulad tayo sa mga pagano na MARAMI at may IBAT IBANG MGA DIYOS.