"Resbak" and "Readme" are the same?

I always wonder why the forces of evil say that the owner of the site resbak.com and my blog were one and the same. Are there similarities in us? The only similarity i know is that we are both INC members and we defend our faith, that's all!

Most of them are Catholic Defenders, Catholics, and ADD members, and i always say to them, "What would be my benefit if i (for exam. i am bro. Conrad, owner of resbak.com) will lie that i am not him?" or "What will i get if i have 2 blogs using different usernames?"...

Will i get money? fame? power? job? car? house? what?

The thing that i can assure you is that I AM NOT BRO. CONRAD OBLIGATION. SO, dont mistaken us for being one, or say to him what ive done to you or say to me what he had done to you! Because if i am truly him, i will surely tell it to you.

They may ask: Any evidence that you are not Conrad?

I HAVE, i will show it to you so that you will be ashamed of yourself, being an instrument of the devil, accusing us that is not true.

This accusation came from a confused ADD member Jake Astudillo, didnt know that resbak and readme is not the same, on the date January 29, 2010 and here is what he said:

That Wikipedia thing is a product of the editing of the Iglesia ni Cristo (INC) members who live there.
Conrad J. Obligacion who stole the TruthCaster monicker and who calls himself “ReadMe” and Resbak attempted to re-write the whole of the bio of Bro. Eliseo Soriano in Wikipedia and made it entirely negative.
Obviously, they are being protected by Moriori of Wikipedia.
Source: Webupon

First of all, i dont care with the biography of this false preacher Mr. Eli Soriano, what i care is about the INC on wikipedia, i will honestly tell you that i edited about the INC, Bro. Felix, Bro. Erano and Bro. Eduardo because if it is not lack of information, most are misleading statements came from the nonmembers who is jealous with the INC.

But, always return to its original copy by moderators in the wikipedia, because there is a process on editing the pages, it should be first discussed on its forum before it will be changed, so now, i have nothing to do with that so i just ignore what is written in wikipedia because some of the info's there are not true.

This is the evidence that i am not Bro. Conrad:



I commented on one of his post dated Oct. 31, 2009, if i am him why do i need to comment as readme if i have my own username resbak?

Another evidence:




If i am him, am i crazy to comment on my own site and answer my own comment with a different username?

And most importantly, why would i create a BLOG if i have my own WEBSITE?

Is website higher than a blog?

Ofcourse. So why would I? If i am him, then i would then buy a domain name (.com) for this blog. If you will look his english skills, it is undoubtedly far from my english grammars and so on. And i always admit that i am not that good in english, because that's what i am.

This accusation of a confused ADD member were poorly believed by a Catholic defender, the owner of the blog catholicdefender2000.blogspot.com which he spread this lie to the other sites, forums, blogs and some other. Which is also believed by nonmembers, so i congratulate Ernesto Vasol in his efforts to create lies in the INC.

Again, Im not Bro. Conrad, Im not Aerial, and other usernames that accussed to me, i am only one, README! I do not use any other username and i do not comment as anonymus because its a childish thing, just to hide myself? Tsk.

Bro. Conrad already answered this accusation on his blog:

Gay prostitute blogger confuses resbak and readme.

Im warning everybody, dont believe anything what others say,
BELIEVE IN THE TRUTH.