"Ipaglaban mo nang puspusan ang pananampalataya. Panghawakan mong mabuti ang buhay na walang hanggan, dahil diyan ka tinawag ng Diyos nang ipahayag mo sa harap ng maraming saksi ang iyong pananalig kay Cristo." I Tim. 6:12

January 28, 2013

Historically and biblically, the Catholic Church cannot trace its origin back to the 1st century

FACTS:

Historically, the Catholic Church cannot trace its origin back to the 1st century.

Biblically, the Catholic Church cannot trace its origin back to the 1st century.

The doctrines and practices of the Catholic Church cannot trace its origin back to the doctrines and practices of the 1st century church of Christ.

The doctrines and practices of the Catholic Church cannot trace its origin back to the teachings in the bible.


______________________________


Catholics claim that their church is the only Christian church that can trace its roots back to the first century but i doubt it, because their claim is very impossible for them to prove especially if we will compare their doctrines, practices and beliefs to that of the 1st century church of Christ. Everything in the Catholic Church is far different to the church that was established by Christ, and i am 100% sure that the Catholic Church is not the church of Christ not because i am a non catholic but because ive examine basic facts about the history of the Catholic Church and some of its doctrines and practices.

We do not deny that the Catholic Church in the beginning was the church of Christ. But saying that the Catholic Church is the "church of Christ" based on its teachings (which is very important because those are the things that will bring us salvation) is very hard to accept.

How about you, will you accept that the 1st century church of Christ is the Catholic Church if youve learned that there are so many new doctrines and practices invented by the Catholics after the death of the apostles? I mean, these:

200 ADImmersion of infants who are dying, but considered sinless. (Tertullian V.12)
250 ADNorth Africa region is first to practice infant baptism and reduced the age of baptism from minors to all newborns. This is opposed by other regions.
257 ADBaptism by sprinkling for adults instead of immersion first used as an exception for those on sick beds, but it caused great dispute.
300 ADPrayers for the dead
320 ADSpecial dress code of the clergy in worship
325 ADAt the general council of Nice, 325, it was proposed indeed, probably by the Western bishop Hosius, to forbid entirely the marriage of priests; but the motion met with strong opposition, and was rejected.
325 ADThe date for Easter was set.
379 ADPraying to Mary & Saints. (prayers of Ephraim Syrus)
385 ADIn the West, the first prohibition of clerical marriage, which laid claim to universal ecclesiastical authority, proceeded in 385 from the Roman church in the form of a decretal letter of the bishop Siricius to Himerius, bishop of Tarragona in Spain.
389 ADMariolatry begins with Gregory Nazianzen, who mentions in a eulogy, how Justina had besought the virgin Mary to protect her virginity.
400 ADImpossibility of apostasy or once saved always saved, (Augustine XII.9)
416 ADInfant baptism by immersion commanded of all infants (Council Of Mela, Austin was the principal director)
430 ADExhalation of Virgin Mary: "Mother of God" first applied by the Council of Ephesus
502 ADSpecial dress code of the Clergy all the time.
500 ADThe "Habit" of Nuns (Black gowns with white tunics)
519 ADLent
526 ADExtreme Unction
593 ADThe Doctrine of Purgatory popularized from the Apocrypha by Gregory the Great
600 ADFirst use of Latin in worship (Gregory I)
Beginning of the Orthodox/Roman Catholic church as we know it today in its present organization.
607 AD Click to View First Pope: Boniface III is the first person to take the title of "universal Bishop" by decree of Emperor Phocas.
608 ADPope Boniface IV. turns the Pantheon in Rome into a temple of Mary ad martyres: the pagan Olympus into a Christian heaven of gods.
670 ADInstrumental music: first organ by Pope Vitalian
709 AD Kissing of Pope Constantine's feet
753 ADBaptism by sprinkling for those on sick beds officially accepted.
787 ADWorship of icons and statue approved (2nd council of Nicea)
787 ADRome (Latin) and Constantinople (Greek) part ways and begin the drift towards complete split, resulting in two denominations emerging in 1054 AD.
965 ADBaptism of bells instituted by Pope John XIII
850 AD Burning of Holy Candles
995 ADCanonization of dead saints, first by Pope John XV
998 ADGood Friday: fish only and the eating-red meat forbidden
1009 ADHoly water
1022 ADPenance
1054 ADRoman Catholic church breaks away from the Orthodox church
1054 ADRoman Catholics officially embrace instrumental music, Orthodox reject instrumental music down to the present time.
1079 ADCelibacy enforced for priests, bishops, presbyters (Pope Gregory VII)
1090 ADRosary beads: invented by Peter the Hermit
1095 ADInstrumental music
1190 ADSale of Indulgences or "tickets to sin" (punishment of sin removed)
1215 ADTransubstantiation by Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council
1215 ADAuricular Confession of sins to priests instituted by Pope Innocent III, (Lateran Council)
1215 ADMass a Sacrifice of Christ
1217 ADAdoration and Elevation of Host: ie. communion bread (Pope Honrius III)
1230 ADRinging bells at Mass
1251 ADThe Scapular, the brown cloak worn by monks invented by Simon Stock
1268 ADPriestly power of absolution
1311 ADBaptism by sprinkling accepted as the universal standard instead of immersion for all, not just the sick. (Council of Ravenna)
1414 ADLaity no longer offered Lord's cup at communion (Council of Constance)
1439 ADPurgatory a dogma by the Council of Florence (see 593 AD)
1439 ADDoctrine of Seven Sacraments affirmed
1480 ADThe Inquisition (of Spain)
1495 ADPapal control of marriage rights
1534 ADOrder of Jesuits founded by Loyola
1545 ADMan-made tradition of church made equal to Bible (Council of Trent)
1545 ADApocryphal books added to Bible (Council of Trent)
1546 ADJustification by human works of merit
1546 ADMass universally said in Latin (see 600 AD)
1547 ADConfirmation
1560 ADPersonal opinions of Pope Pius IV imposed as the official creed
1864 ADSyllabus Errorum [Syllabus of Errors] proclaimed that "Catholic countries" could not tolerate other religions, (no freedom of religion), conscience, separation of church and State condemned, asserted the Pope's temporal authority over all civil rulers (Ratified by Pope Pius IX and Vatican Council) condemned
1870 ADInfallibility of Pope (Vatican council)
1908 AD All Catholics should be christened into the church
1930 ADPublic Schools condemned by Pope Pius XII (see 1864 AD)
1950 ADSinners prayer, invented by Billy Sunday and made popular by Billy Graham. (Some Catholics now use this)
1950 AD Assumption of the body of the Virgin Mary into heaven shortly after her death. (Pope Pius XII)
1954 ADImmaculate conception of Mary proclaimed by Pope Pius XII
1995 AD The use of girls in the traditional alter boy duties
1996 ADCatholics can believe in Evolution (Pope John Paul II)

source: bible.ca

I become enlightened in some things when i read about the origin of the Catholic Church by gotquestions.org:

Question: "What is the origin of the Catholic Church?"

Answer:
The Roman Catholic Church contends that its origin is the death, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus Christ in approximately A.D. 30. The Catholic Church proclaims itself to be the church that Jesus Christ died for, the church that was established and built by the apostles. Is that the true origin of the Catholic Church? On the contrary. Even a cursory reading of the New Testament will reveal that the Catholic Church does not have its origin in the teachings of Jesus or His apostles. In the New Testament, there is no mention of the papacy, worship/adoration of Mary (or the immaculate conception of Mary, the perpetual virginity of Mary, the assumption of Mary, or Mary as co-redemptrix and mediatrix), petitioning saints in heaven for their prayers, apostolic succession, the ordinances of the church functioning as sacraments, infant baptism, confession of sin to a priest, purgatory, indulgences, or the equal authority of church tradition and Scripture. So, if the origin of the Catholic Church is not in the teachings of Jesus and His apostles, as recorded in the New Testament, what is the true origin of the Catholic Church?

For the first 280 years of Christian history, Christianity was banned by the Roman Empire, and Christians were terribly persecuted. This changed after the “conversion” of the Roman Emperor Constantine. Constantine “legalized” Christianity with the Edict of Milan in A.D. 313. Later, in A.D. 325, Constantine called the Council of Nicea in an attempt to unify Christianity. Constantine envisioned Christianity as a religion that could unite the Roman Empire, which at that time was beginning to fragment and divide. While this may have seemed to be a positive development for the Christian church, the results were anything but positive. Just as Constantine refused to fully embrace the Christian faith, but continued many of his pagan beliefs and practices, so the Christian church that Constantine promoted was a mixture of true Christianity and Roman paganism.

Constantine found that with the Roman Empire being so vast, expansive, and diverse, not everyone would agree to forsake his or her religious beliefs to embrace Christianity. So, Constantine allowed, and even promoted, the “Christianization” of pagan beliefs. Completely pagan and utterly unbiblical beliefs were given new “Christian” identities. Some clear examples of this are as follows:

(1) The Cult of Isis, an Egyptian mother-goddess religion, was absorbed into Christianity by replacing Isis with Mary. Many of the titles that were used for Isis, such as “Queen of Heaven,” “Mother of God,” and theotokos (“God-bearer”) were attached to Mary. Mary was given an exalted role in the Christian faith, far beyond what the Bible ascribes to her, in order to attract Isis worshippers to a faith they would not otherwise embrace. Many temples to Isis were, in fact, converted into temples dedicated to Mary. The first clear hints of Catholic Mariology occur in the writings of Origen, who lived in Alexandria, Egypt, which happened to be the focal point of Isis worship.

(2) Mithraism was a religion in the Roman Empire in the 1st through 5th centuries A.D. It was very popular among the Romans, especially among Roman soldiers, and was possibly the religion of several Roman emperors. While Mithraism was never given “official” status in the Roman Empire, it was the de facto official religion until Constantine and succeeding Roman emperors replaced Mithraism with Christianity. One of the key features of Mithraism was a sacrificial meal, which involved eating the flesh and drinking the blood of a bull. Mithras, the god of Mithraism, was “present” in the flesh and blood of the bull, and when consumed, granted salvation to those who partook of the sacrificial meal (this is known as theophagy, the eating of one’s god). Mithraism also had seven “sacraments,” making the similarities between Mithraism and Roman Catholicism too many to ignore. Constantine and his successors found an easy substitute for the sacrificial meal of Mithraism in the concept of the Lord’s Supper/Christian communion. Sadly, some early Christians had already begun to attach mysticism to the Lord’s Supper, rejecting the biblical concept of a simple and worshipful remembrance of Christ’s death and shed blood. The Romanization of the Lord’s Supper made the transition to a sacrificial consumption of Jesus Christ, now known as the Catholic Mass/Eucharist, complete.

(3) Most Roman emperors (and citizens) were henotheists. A henotheist is one who believes in the existence of many gods, but focuses primarily on one particular god or considers one particular god supreme over the other gods. For example, the Roman god Jupiter was supreme over the Roman pantheon of gods. Roman sailors were often worshippers of Neptune, the god of the oceans. When the Catholic Church absorbed Roman paganism, it simply replaced the pantheon of gods with the saints. Just as the Roman pantheon of gods had a god of love, a god of peace, a god of war, a god of strength, a god of wisdom, etc., so the Catholic Church has a saint who is “in charge” over each of these, and many other categories. Just as many Roman cities had a god specific to the city, so the Catholic Church provided “patron saints” for the cities.

(4) The supremacy of the Roman bishop (the papacy) was created with the support of the Roman emperors. With the city of Rome being the center of government for the Roman Empire, and with the Roman emperors living in Rome, the city of Rome rose to prominence in all facets of life. Constantine and his successors gave their support to the bishop of Rome as the supreme ruler of the church. Of course, it is best for the unity of the Roman Empire that the government and state religion be centered in the same location. While most other bishops (and Christians) resisted the idea of the Roman bishop being supreme, the Roman bishop eventually rose to supremacy, due to the power and influence of the Roman emperors. When the Roman Empire collapsed, the popes took on the title that had previously belonged to the Roman emperors – Pontificus Maximus.

Many more examples could be given. These four should suffice in demonstrating the true origin of the Catholic Church. Of course the Roman Catholic Church denies the pagan origin of its beliefs and practices. The Catholic Church disguises its pagan beliefs under layers of complicated theology. The Catholic Church excuses and denies its pagan origin beneath the mask of “church tradition.” Recognizing that many of its beliefs and practices are utterly foreign to Scripture, the Catholic Church is forced to deny the authority and sufficiency of Scripture.

The origin of the Catholic Church is the tragic compromise of Christianity with the pagan religions that surrounded it. Instead of proclaiming the gospel and converting the pagans, the Catholic Church “Christianized” the pagan religions, and “paganized” Christianity. By blurring the differences and erasing the distinctions, yes, the Catholic Church made itself attractive to the people of the Roman Empire. One result was the Catholic Church becoming the supreme religion in the “Roman world” for centuries. However, another result was the most dominant form of Christianity apostatizing from the true gospel of Jesus Christ and the true proclamation of God’s Word.

Second Timothy 4:3-4 declares, “For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths.”

And because i am not bias, i will also show you the FACTS about the Iglesia ni Cristo:

Historically, the Iglesia ni Cristo cannot trace its origin back to the 1st century, because this church is the re establishment of the 1st century church of Christ that we believe had apostatized. It was re established in 1914 (based on the prophecy about the ends of the earth) through Bro. Felix Manalo (we believed to be God's last messenger and not the founder of the church).

Biblically, the Iglesia ni Cristo CAN trace its origin back to the 1st century because the Iglesia ni Cristo or Church of Christ in english is the ONLY ONE CHURCH that Christ established.

The doctrines and practices of the Iglesia ni Cristo CAN trace its origin back to the doctrines and practices of the 1st century church of Christ. There may be some differences because the Iglesia ni Cristo (Church of Christ) today is in the modern times.

The doctrines and practices of the Iglesia ni Cristo CAN trace its origin back to the teachings in the bible.

10 comments:

  1. minsan di ko maintindihan ang mga catholic faith defenders... sinasabi nila wala daw mababasa na iglesia ni cristo sa bible pero sinasabi din nila na sila daw ang tunay na iglesia ni cristo 33ad... parang binatikos nila yung sarili nila di ba?tama?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bro, pwede po bang paki-amplify ang explaination sa statement niyong " we cant deny that Catholic church is the "Church of Christ" in the beginning". Prang na-confuse po ako doon. Salamat po.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ang statement ko po ay "we DONT deny that the catholic church..."

      eto po ay base na rin sa sabi sa pasugo na ginagamit ng catholic defenders:

      PASUGO Abril 1966, p. 46
      “Ang Iglesia Katolika na sa pasimula ay siyang Iglesia ni Cristo."

      pero oo nga parang may mali lang sa grammar ko. ieedit ko nalang ako rin naguluhan haha hirap mag english^^


      Delete
    2. Ang Iglesia Katolika na sa pasimula (in the beginning) ay siyang Iglesia ni Cristo. Bakit??? dahil ang Iglesia Katolika ang NAGING RESULTA ng mga MALING ARAL na ipinandaya sa original na Iglesia ni Cristo noong unang siglo pagkatapos mamatay ng mga apostol. Pagkamatay ng mga apostol, LUMITAW na 'yung mga BULAANG PROPETA yung iba dyan galing din sa Iglesia ni Cristo sila yung sinasabi ng biblia na MGA ASONG LOBO na sisira sa KAWAN (iglesia ni Cristo).
      Ano ang mga pinag-gagagawa ng mga bulaang propeta na ito????
      Noon kasi ang tunay na pangalan ng iglesia ay "Iglesia ni Cristo",
      tapos nung mamatay ang mga apostol, naging "Iglesia Katolika" na ang pangalan! (pangalang inimbento ng mga bulaang propeta sila yung mga naging pari)... bukod sa pangalan ano pa??? si Cristo ginawa nilang "Diyos", di nakuntento ginawa pa nilang "Dios" pati ang espiritu santo para makabuo sila ng "trinity"...si apostol Pedro naman ginawa nilang "PAPA"... ipinasok na 'yung pagbabawal sa pag-aasawa, pagbabawal na kumain ng karne, nagsulputan na yung mga rebulto at mga larawan! kung sino-sino na yung mga ginawa nilang santo!!! kumakain na rin ng DUGO!!!! ANG TANONG!!!!!!! IGLESIA PA BA YAN NI CRISTO?????????????? HINDI NA!!!!! IGLESIA KATOLIKA NA YAN!!!!! ARAL NG DEMONYO NA ANG GUSTO!!!

      Buti na lang may sinabi noon ang Panginoong Jesus na MAGKAKAROON PA NG ISANG KAWAN (kawan=iglesia ni Cristo)sa panahon ng mga wakas ng lupa na ang palantandaan ay ang mga digmaan (1st and 2nd world war), tag-gutom at mga lindol... Sa history, lumitaw ang kawan na ito (Iglesia ni Cristo)sa Malayong silangan (Pilipinas na nasa malayong silangan) kaalinsabay ng 1st World War noong July 27, 1914.... BUMANGON ULI ang mga TUNAY NA ARAL na dati-dati ay sinira ng Iglesia Katolika (dating iglesia ni Cristo).

      Ano ang pag-ibig ng Diyos? Dadagitin ng sugo ang mga miyembro ng Iglesia katolika!!! ibabalik uli sa tunay na pananampalataya! sa tunay na iglesia! iglesiang sinabi ni Cristo na "magiging isang kawan" magiging isang Iglesia ni Cristo!!! hindi na luluhod sa mga rebulto at mga larawan!!!! wala nang rosa-rosaryo!!! wala ng tatawaging "PAPA" spiritual father!!! hindi na kakain ng dugo!!! wala ng mga santo na dadasalan!!! wala ng paniniwalaang purgatoryo! wala ng mga aral ng demonyo!!! etc... etc... at higit sa lahat KIKILALA NA ULI SA IISANG DIYOS NA TUNAY, ANG AMA LAMANG!!!!!!!

      kung noon,ang iglesia ni cristo nang pasimula ay NAGING iglesia katolika. PERO NGAYON, ang mga katolikong uunawa, sasampalataya at susunod sa mga TUNAY na aral... ay ihahatid na sa Iglesia ni Cristo ngayon!!!

      Kaya mga kapatid, PUSPUSANG PAGPAPATIBAY... Advance Happy 100th Anniversary!!!

      Delete
    3. NAgtataka lang po ako sa comment mo, bilang trinitarian di ko mawari na hindi Dios si Cristo. Bakit nyu po nasabi na Hindi Dios si Cristo? pwede po ba ninyu akong ma explainan? Thanks

      Delete
    4. Jon,

      Eto po ang dahilan, kailangan natin malaman ang pinagmulan ng doktrinang ito: http://readmeiglesianicristo.blogspot.com/2013/08/mahalagang-impormasyon-kung-paano.html

      Delete
    5. thanks kapatid nabasa ko na.

      Delete
  3. kuya readme diba ang taong di inabot ng kautusan hahatulan sa puso eh di ibig sabihin pu ba nuon maliligtas na ang tao basta mabait kung di inabot ng kautusan? eh di parang marami parin ang maliligtas?


    Kuya paki send nman pu sa email ko Hot_sauce_03@yahoo.com
    tnx po tanung pu kasi ng akay ng friend ko.: )

    ReplyDelete
  4. PANDARAYA LANG PO ang ginagawa ng mga pare at mga Catholic Defender na pagsipi sa PASUGO, Abril, 1966 para papaniwalain ang mga tao na naniniwala raw tayo na ang Iglesia Katolika ay siya ring Iglesia ni Cristo.

    Ganito ang pagsipi na ginawa nila na may pandaraya:

    “Ang Iglesia Katolika na sa pasimula ay siyang Iglesia ni Cristo." PASUGO Abril 1966, p. 46

    Ngunit ano po ang totoo? PINUTOL NILA ANG KABUUAN NG NAKASULAT DOON SA SINIPI NILA MULA SA PASUGO. Ang totoong nakasulat doon ay ganito po:

    “…Ang totoo, hanggang sa kasalukuyan ay patuloy na ginagawa ni Satanas ang pagpasok ng mga maling aral upang ang Iglesia Katolika na sa pasimula ay siyang Iglesia ni Cristo ay mamalaging nakatalikod sa habang panahon. Sadyang matalino at tuso ang diablo. Hindi niya ginawang maging biglaan ang pagtalikod sa Iglesia ni Cristo noong unang siglo. Sa pagkasangkapan niya sa mga bulaang tagapangaral na pinapaging dalubhasa niya sa lisyang paggamit sa mga salita ng Panginoong Diyos ay nangyaring papaniwalain niya ang maraming tao. Ito raw ay nagpatuloy hanggang sa kasalukuyan. Hindi raw naitalikod ang Iglesiang itinayo ni Cristo. At lalong hindi raw ginawa ng Iglesia Katolika ang pagtalikod. Bakit nga hindi natin masasabi na sadyang tuso at matalino ang diablo? Yaon mismong mga kinasangkapan niya ay hindi nababatid na naganap ang pagtalikod sa tunay na Iglesia.” (Kung Papaano Naitalikod sa Pananampalataya ang Iglesia na itinatag ni Cristo noong Unang Siglo, Sinulat ni Tomas C. Catangay, PASUGO, Abril 1966, p. 46)

    NAPANSIN BA NIYO ANG GINAWANG PANDARAYA NG MGA PARI AT DEFENSOR KATOLIKO SA PAGSIPI NG PASUGO NG INC? SINADYANG PINUTOL NILA ANG TUNAY NA NILALAMAN PARA LAMANG MAKAPANLINLANG NG MGA TAO. WALANG SINASABI SA PASUGO NA ANG IGLESIA KATOLIKA AY SIYA RING IGLESIA NI CRISTO (IKAR ≠ INC). MANAPA ANG ITINUTURO SA ARTIKULONG ITO NG PASUGO AY ANG IGLESIA KATOLIKA ANG KATUPARAN NG IBINABALA NI CRISTO AT MGA APOSTOL NA MAGAGANAP NA PAGTALIKOD SA MGA ALAGAD NOON.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kung mapapansin po natin, sa pagkakasipi nila ay:

    “Ang Iglesia Katolika na sa pasimula ay siyang Iglesia ni Cristo." PASUGO Abril 1966, p. 46

    kapag gumamit ng quotation marks ay dapat walang binago sa kinopyang bahagi.
    Dapat sana ay ganito ang pagkakasipi kung may quotation marks:

    "...ang Iglesia Katolika na sa pasimula ay siyang Iglesia ni Cristo..."

    upang makita na may naunang mga pananalita pa at sa bandang dulo naman ay mahihinuha na may karugtong pa ang pangungusap na sinipi o kinopya.

    Kasamahan yata ni Mr. Talibong ang mga yan kaya ganyan sila mandaya.

    ReplyDelete

RULES ARE STRICTLY BEING IMPLEMENTED.
COMMENTS THAT VIOLATE RULES ARE DELETED.

1. Comments should be related to the topic posted
2. No flooding
3. No cursing and name calling (kultoliko, ADDict, Iglesia ni Manalo, etc)
4. No posting of any kind of advertisement/promotion
5. No debates/arguments

You can ask, suggest, answer or react to an article. Discussion or sharing of knowledge is appreciated, not to be confused with debates/arguments.