"Ipaglaban mo nang puspusan ang pananampalataya. Panghawakan mong mabuti ang buhay na walang hanggan, dahil diyan ka tinawag ng Diyos nang ipahayag mo sa harap ng maraming saksi ang iyong pananalig kay Cristo." I Tim. 6:12

April 9, 2011

INC in RH bill



Iglesia ni Cristo backs RH bill

THE influential Iglesia ni Cristo said it is willing to support bills on reproductive health “as long as there would be no immoral elements in them.”
In a letter to Representative Rogelio J. Espina, chairman of the population and family relations committee in the House of Representatives, Eduardo Manalo, INC executive minister, said the organization supports “modern methods of contraception” as long as they do not encourage abortion that, with the use of “abortifacients involve the taking of life, which God explicitly forbids.”
He said INC does “not support the natural family planning method and all its variants. These so called birth control methods depend upon abstinence on the part of the married couple. These methods are not only unnatural and ineffective but they are also immoral, since they contradict the commandment that God has given to married couples,” Manalo said. “Parents today have a moral obligation to plan the number of their children and keep it under control.”
“We believe that it is a moral imperative for parents to watch over all their children and provide them with food, shelter and clothing as well as proper education and religious and moral training,” he said.
The INC has been known for its strong political influence, especially during elections when the organization reportedly votes as a bloc. It is also known to maintain a close “friendship” with incumbent administrations while not losing “discreet connection” with the opposition.
“We are all well aware of the dire situation of our country caused by overpopulation,” said Manalo, adding that many of society’s worsening ills “can be traced to families growing so large.”
source: cathnewsphil.com






Here is what written in the letter:

12 October 2010

HON. ROGELIO J. ESPINA, M.D.
Chairman
Committee on Population and Family Relations
House of Representatives
Republic of the Philippines

Dear Congressman Espina,

We would like to thank the Committee on Population and Family Relations for requesting our position concerning the Bills of Reproductive Health. We are all well aware of the dire situation of our country caused by overpopulation. Many of society’s worsening ills—from homeless families starving in miserable conditions and children not in school but instead begging day and night in nearly every major street to the rapidly spreading problems with drug abuse and rising crime rates—can be traced to families growing so large that an increasing number of parents cannot provide the most basic human needs to their families.

We consider it commendable that our lawmakers care enough for our fellow Filipinos that they are doing what they can do to alleviate the hardships so many of our countrymen are facing. IN what they propose, they can bring about not only an economic good for our countrymen but also a moral one. We are ready to support the Bills on Reproductive Health as long as there would be no immoral elements in them.

What are the moral aspects of the proposed bills that we support? We believe that it is moral imperative for parents to watch over all their children and provide them with food, shelter, and clothing, as well as proper education and religious and moral training. Hence, parents todayhave (sic) a moral obligation to plan the number of their children and keep it under control. The Bible states that a parent who does not provide for the needs of his own household is worse than an unbeliever (I Tim. 5:8). Since modern methods of contraception—by preventing married couples from having any unplanned pregnancies—assist in supporting this Christian principle, we support their use as long as these methods are empirically not abortifacient. Abortion and the use of abortifacients involve the taking of life, which God explicitly forbids (Exod. 20:13).

We do not support the natural family planning method and all its variants. These so-called birth control methods depend upon abstinence on the part of the married couple when the woman is fertile but allows marital relations only when she is not. These methods are not only unnatural and ineffective but they also are immoral, since they contradict the commandment that God has given to married couples. The Bible instructs married couples not to deprive one another of intimate marital relations for long, extended periods of time; further, any abstinence at all for a married couple is supposed to be with the mutual consent of husband and wife and not for the purpose of preventing pregnancies (I Cor. 7:3-5).

We appreciate the Committee’s gesture of soliciting our stand on this timely yet controversial issue.

Very truly yours,

EDUARDO V. MANALO
Executive Minister
___________________________________________________

There is a bible verse that the Catholic Church believe, it is written in the book of GENESIS where people is still few, they say that God said: "go fourth and multiply", but when the earth is filled with people, that became a problem to most countries called OVERPOPULATION, do still we need to follow what was written in the bible made thousand years ago, about this thing?

When there is OVERPOPULATION, do we need to multiply and multiply to the point of some are dying because of hunger and so on?

Do you get the point?

the catholic church wanted to point out that God doesnt know what the words empty and full mean.


And so,

If there is one to BLAME WHY THE PHILIPPINES IS STILL ON POVERTY, we know whom to blame!

its not just about corruption, its about the INFLUENCE and the commanding of this powerful church to the government every now and then!


REMEMBER: Our resources is LIMITED!

this message is for those CATHOLIC DEFENDERS who have a low understanding about life, being blinded and influenced about their true opinion and what was happening in reality because of their faith!

I just admire those catholic authorities,and even priests that support the RH bill, YES! there are! and im not inventing a story because just this month, ive watch a documentary on channel 11, GMA NEWS TV, on reel time, about this.


Atleast, THEY ARE OPEN MINDED ON WHAT WAS REALLY HAPPENING ON REALITY!

AGAIN, ITS NOT JUST THE CORRUPTION IS THE PROBLEM HERE IN OUR COUNTRY THAT MAKES US STILL ON POVERTY!



4 comments:

  1. forest king,

    a. yun na nga ang point boplaks talaga, 'poor filipinos are not in poverty', parang sinasabi mong ang mga mahirap ay hindi wala sa kahirap. boplaks. boplaks!

    b. yes, you and pro-life people are morons. its really a STUPIDITY!

    c. ok, ALAM MO PALA ANG MAHIHIRAP KARANIWAN NA ANG MAY MALALAKI KUNG MAG ANK! and i do not say that all poors does HAVE MANY CHILDREN! not all, BUT MOST.

    d. see the STUPIDITY? SAYING OVERPOPULATION IS NOT ONE OF THE REASONS WHY PEOPLE/FAMILIES CANT ESCAPE TO POVERTY, IS LIKE SAYING THAT YOURSELF REALLY NEEDS MENTAL HELP. pro-life is against filipinos to escape from POVERTY! PERIOD. corruption and whatsoever are just SOME reasons, but the big problem, the no. 1 CAUSE IS OVERPOPULATION!!!!!!!!! no matter how the government gives its effortssss, yes many efforts like giving them better living and so on, still, if the population increases, it is also the increase of RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GOVERNMENT AND SO NGO'S ALIKE!

    e. you are not reasonable, you think like a gradeschooler! hello? giving them condom instead of food or what? silly! so childish! you makes me laugh on that, really funny. hehehe what only the government wanted is to CONTROL THE POPULATION, not having laws not anymore to have a child, and so on. managing, controlling, having an idea about a good PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE OF THE KIDS, NOT PLANNING WHEN AGAIN THEY WILL HAVE ANOTHER ROUND OF SEX!

    this is the conclusion: pro-life are AGAINST to poor families wanted to have a brighter future for their children! solving main problem is the SOLUTION, not solving SOME SOLUTION!

    ReplyDelete
  2. MR. FOREST KING

    IBABALIK KO LANG SA IYO ANG SALITA MO , KASI MAS BAGAY SAYO ITO,

    Pangatlo, marami nang beses na siya AY NAPAHIYA DAHIL SA KANIYANG PAGSISINUNGALING. Kung ano anong kwento na walang kwenta ay pinapatulan. Kawawa naman ito si Bagwis. Lumalaban, kulang naman sa bala. Mga tsismis ginagawang katutuhanan. Talaga naman.

    SALITA MO SIR NA BAGAY SA YO...SINO ANG LUMALABAS NA DISPERADO NGAYON ,,,WALANG IBA KUNDI IKAW SIR.........BAGWIS2010
    January 10, 2011 2:49 PM
    Anonymous said...
    MR. HARK PAKITULUNGAN NGA SI MR. FOREST KING,ALAM KO NGAYON NAGHAHANAP NG TABLOD NA PINAGKUNAN NG TSISMIS NA ITO:

    Hey, naalala ko pala. para kontrahin ang issue na ito, gumawa ang INC ng WENTO NA ALA NAMANG WENTA. Nagpakita daw ang panginoong Jesukristo kay Manalo at inatasan siyang pastol! Wahahahaha desperado na talaga itong INC.

    MR, HARK, PLS. TULUNGAN MO SI SIR DAHIL HIRAP NA HIRAP SUMAGOT......BAGWIS2010
    January 10, 2011 3:38 PM
    April 21, 2011 12:40 AM
    Anonymous said...
    mr. king

    sabi mo pa:

    Hahahaha. MALAKI TALAGA ANG PROBLEMA NG INC.

    Tinatanong ni Bagwis, sino daw nag-baptize kay Juan. Hindi niya yata nabasa ang Luke 1:41 kung saan ang Holy Spirit mismo ang nagbaptize kay Juan habang siya ay nasa sinapupunan pa ni Santa Isabel.

    Iyan kasi, hindi nagbabasa ng Bibliya! hehehehe
    January 4, 2011 5:29 PM

    si isabel ba ang ina ni juan bautista mr. forest king??hahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahaah

    ReplyDelete
  3. i lyk this blog really.......pagpasensyahan nalang po natin yung mga tagasanlibutan mga kapatid....alam naman nating wala silang nalalaman.....

    ReplyDelete
  4. No debates. No arguments. Ika-nga ng rules dito. Haaay :3

    ReplyDelete

RULES ARE STRICTLY BEING IMPLEMENTED.
COMMENTS THAT VIOLATE RULES ARE DELETED.

1. Comments should be related to the topic posted
2. No flooding
3. No cursing and name calling (kultoliko, ADDict, Iglesia ni Manalo, etc)
4. No posting of any kind of advertisement/promotion
5. No debates/arguments

You can ask, suggest, answer or react to an article. Discussion or sharing of knowledge is appreciated, not to be confused with debates/arguments.