Eliseo Soriano, founder of the Members church of god international is always wanting of a debate one on one in the time of Bro. Erano Manalo, but doesnt challenge other leader of some churches!
Every member of Soriano's church always say that Iglesia ni Cristo ministers especially Bro. Erano Manalo are all coward on debating to Eliseo Soriano, is it true?
Is it also true that Bro. Erano Manalo, when he was living is afraid on debating to Eliseo Soriano?
Is it true that ministers and Bro. Manalo are hiding and dont want to debate Eliseo Soriano?
Well, the question is, who is the REAL COWARD, THAT DOESNT WANT TO DEBATE?
THE CHALLENGE AND CONDITIONS
This is a video of a minister asking Soriano what is the "Holy kiss" in Romans 16:16, poor Mr. Soriano was shocked and takes a long time to answer the minister.
Evangelical workers of ADD didnt show on the debate!
WHAT A SHAME
MR. ELISEO SORIANO: THE REAL COWARD!
I know the church of Soriano still saying and pointing out that it is the Iglesia ni Cristo ministers and especially Bro. Manalo is the cowards and doesnt want to debate Eliseo Soriano, tsk. WRONG!
It is Soriano himself is the real coward, how?
WHERE IS HE NOW! IM ASKING ALL THE MEMBERS OF ADD OF SORIANO, WHERE IS ELI SORIANO NOW?
Who the one is really hiding? Is it Bro. Manalo and ministers or Eliseo Soriano?
wait, before ending this, why is it that Bro. Manalo as executive minister do not do what Eliseo Soriano does? Like preaching on television, and so on, does that mean he is coward or hiding?
A VERY BIG NO!
The work of the executive minister is not to preach on television, not to debate to anybody. He is the 'tagapamahalang pangkalahatan', he is the administrator of the whole church, overseeing the church, and so on.
Like the president of the Philippines, his/her work is not for him to attend everyone's needs, go to every province to check each one of us... no, no, no! Instead of it, he/she assigned someone to do tasks that he/she cannot do byhis/herself! that's why we have government officials!
And in the INC, it is the same, it is not the administrator's task to preach on every locale, preach on t.v and so on. do you get my point?
It is not like Soriano, because his church is still a minority, he is the one who preach on t.v and because even he assigned members to do what he does, ofcourse they cannot do it, the question and answer task. hehe!
Members of Soriano's church recognize him as a messenger of god that's why he is the one who preaches, on the other hand, the INC recognize Bro. Felix Manalo as God's messenger in these last days, and the work of preaching is DONE by the last messenger of GOD! He is done on what Soriano still doing!
There is assigned to do public debates! I think this generation, we have Bro. Jose Ventilation and Bro. Ramil Parba. If Eliseo Soriano cannot face our ministers to a debate, how can it be to the ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CHURCH?
CONCLUSION: Eliseo Soriano is the real deceiver, coward, and looser!
Hi readme this is not related to the topic above but i would like request see if you can create a post about this news online,
ReplyDeleteINC wins libel case vs ‘Dating Daan’ evangelist
By Janvic Mateo (The Philippine Star) | Updated December 18, 2013 - 12:00am
MANILA, Philippines - A Quezon City court has ordered evangelist Eliseo Soriano to pay religious group Iglesia Ni Cristo (INC) a fine of P100,000 for the supposed malicious and libelous remarks that he uttered in his television show 10 years ago.
In a 19-page decision, Regional Trial Court Branch 92 Judge Eleuterio Bathan said elements of libel were present in the April 23 and 27, 2003 broadcasts of Soriano’s “Ang Dating Daan,” in which he uttered statements against INC such as “Iglesiang pumapatay ng kapwa tao, manloloko, terrorist, magnanakaw, and mamamatay tao.”
“There is no question that the broadcasts were made public and imputed to Iglesia Ni Cristo defects or circumstances tending to cause it dishonor, discredit and contempt,” read the decision promulgated on Monday.
“Soriano’s remarks… are libelous per se, uncalled for and misleading information to the public. Taken as a whole, the broadcasts suggest Iglesia Ni Cristo is a killer, swindler, a spy, and a terrorist and a thief which is contrary to the doctrines and teachings of every religious sect,” added Bathan.
Soriano failed to attend the promulgation of the decision. Bathan said this takes away his chance of appealing the decision.
During his arraignment in 2005, the evangelist refused to enter a plea, prompting the court to enter a plea of “not guilty” for him.
Nation ( Article MRec ), pagematch: 1, sectionmatch: 1
He also submitted a waiver of presence during the pre-trial conference, in which he admitted that “whenever his name is mentioned (during the trial), he is the same person alleged in the information.”
Records show that Soriano’s lawyer presented witnesses stating that ministers of INC in its television show “Ang Tamang Daan” have repeatedly attacked Soriano and he was just retaliating against the allegations.
But in his decision, Bathan said that the defense of self-defense is without merit as it “will not negate the presence of existence of malice.” He added that this kind of defense is only available in crimes against persons.
The judge also noted that retaliation is different from self-defense.
“He should have filed the necessary or corresponding criminal and/or civil case against (INC) in order to protect his (Soriano) interest. He did not, but instead, made retaliation against INC,” read his decision.
“In doing so, the accused disregarded the true function of courts of justice and took the law into his hands,” he added.
http://www.philstar.com/metro/2013/12/18/1269277/inc-wins-libel-case-vs-dating-daan-evangelist
see next comment
Andaming cheche bureche....
ReplyDeleteHarap na lang,Ka Eli.Walang salita-salita pa!