RH bill: The grand debate-gmanews.tv

There is a program yesterday night, coincidentally that ive turn the channel to channel 11 gmanews.tv that caught my attention, that is, the RH bill: The grand debate...

Ive watched the whole show and its very interesting, sorry to say but the ANTI-RH BILL LOSE! They are what the filipino proverbs say: "Ginigisa sa sariling mantika" hehe
Without being bias, even though i am a pro-rh bill, i will tell the story:

There are set of 3 debaters,

1st round: anti rh, cong. magsaysay vs. pro rh, cong. garin

Cong. Garin is very good in her presentation, all in all she won the debate in the 1st round. Cong. Magsaysay also made her good argument, about the funds of the government, she said the funds on education was lessen by the administration and so the ultimate solution is education and not RH BILL. It caught me, but Cong. Garin defended their side, she said that i think its normal because the other needs should also be funded, her point was, even though the government put so much funds in the education department, if the family continues to increase their family member, it cannot be resolved anyway even the government try its best.

2nd round: anti rh, bishop teodoro bacani vs. pro rh, efren tendero

Bishop Bacani of the Catholic Church seems to be funny here, because of his age, on the 1min. time that he should explain their side, he always didnt finish what he was saying, and he always smile and laugh i think because the other side is making scores, hehe Bishop efren tendero of the phil. council of evangelical churches, has a well point here, he stated that yes, it is said in the bible that god instruct ADAM AND EVE to go fourth and multiply, but its already 2011, in this country we have 90million plus filipinos, that it is also said in the bible that the family should be taken care. How could it be that if you have so many children that you cannot raise and feed them. 2nd round is for pro rh bill!

3rd round: anti rh, PROF. Racelis vs. pro rh Pia Magallona

My first impression is that Pia Magallona should not be picked because they will loose in the 3rd round, and because the other debater is a professor i think the prof. will win. BUT ITS NOT. Pia Magallona, even though she doesnt have such knowledge about it, she stands for it, even though her specialty is parenting. She said that it is more IMMORAL that you have children but cannot raise and feed them, she has a good argument here. On the other side Prof. Racelis, i really didnt understand what she said. hehe but i get what is her point, she was countered by her co-professor in UP, one of the pro rh panel Dr. Sylvia Caludio, that there are many of the prof. in UP and even the deans are pro rh, and so on.

The panel of pro rh were Carlos Celdran, Risa Hontiveros-Baraquel, and Dr. Sylvia Claudio. Risa Hontivers and Sylvia Claudio were very good interrogators, that's why the anti rh is always you know... hehehe Somehow the panel of anti rh were Bishop Deogracias Iñiguez Jr. and Antonio Torralba, and Dr. Deane Campo-Cruz, im sorry to say but they did not really made good arguments and CANT make good arguments. I just hope some able to watch it yesterday, so you may know what am i saying...

more absolute happenings: gmanews.tv1, gmanews.tv2


I also hope that what i think it is Forest King who said that pro rh bill on the debate on ABSCBN lose, what a pity! I wish ive watched that debate so that i can see who WON in that debate, because we cannot trust BIAS CATHOLICS in witnessing events...^^

Why does this bill like this? I mean it becomes so controversial that it cannot pass by the government, why this bill i think the only bill that gone through these, like be debated on television and so on... YOU KNOW WHY?


IT IS ONLY BECAUSE OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.
IF ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH DIDNT MEDDLES IN POLITICS, DO YOU THINK THIS WILL BECOME CONTROVERSIAL?

The CATHOLIC CHURCH use her power to influence other people, even our president, use senators and so on and MAKE SOME ARGUMENTS for exam. the funds will just be corrupted and so on, THESE ARE JUST EXCUSES SO THAT THE RH BILL WILL NOT BE PASSED!

You know why CBCP and bishops making efforts to do so? Because if the rh bill will be passed, its a BIG EMBARRASSMENT FOR THE CATHOLIC CHURCH'S TEACHING! The pope and the church will be fallible AND THEY DONT WANT IT TO HAPPEN...

Anti rh bill REALLY GIVE MISLEAD INFORMATIONS ABOUT USING CONTRACEPTIVES AND SO ON. They are losers because they show that they are close-minded and have a poor educational background.

But really, you know, these anti rh bill senators, and so on would not that be aggressive and so on, if only the CATHOLIC CHURCH WILL NOT IN ANY WAY INFLUENCE THEM AND MEDDLES IN THIS ISSUE.

RH BILL AS WHAT THEY SAY, DOESNT FORCE PEOPLE TO USE THIS AND THAT, NOT WHAT THE CATHOLIC CHURCH DOES, THAT THEY DICTATE PEOPLE. THE BILL RESPECTS EACH RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, ITS A CHOICE, THEY SAID.

if it is a choice why the bishops and so on are so stubborn?

RH BILL IS ANYWAY NOT CONTRARY TO THE BIBLE!
IT IS NOT IMMORAL!

The immorals is this: click the link

Why dont they give chance for the bill to be passed? The president will not think for the badness of the country, you all know that. If it becomes ineffective, then delete the bill.

AGAIN, RH BILL IS NOT THE SOLUTION OR ULTIMATE SOLUTION, ITS NOT A CURE TO POVERTY, ITS JUST ONE OF THE MANY WAYS THAT CAN HELP TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM...

It is not like what anti-rh bill says that it is education is the ultimate solution... hello? even the government try its best, it is like, if the SUPPLY is not enough for the DEMAND, it will be USELESS. How can parents bring their children to school if they have even no money to buy food.


TO THOSE ANTI RH BILL,

BE OPEN MINDED!
DONT MAKE SOME EXCUSE JUST NOT TO PASS THE BILL!
DONT SHOW THAT YOU HAVE A POOR EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND RECEIVED!
DONT EVER MAKE OPINION JUST BECAUSE OF THE CHURCH'S STAND ABOUT IT!
DONT BE FOOLED BY MISLEAD INFO'S MADE BY CATHOLICS AND THOSE ANTI-RH BILL!